<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 953 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164549</link>
    <description>Compounding estimates made for fee purposes do not bind regular sales tax assessment, because the assessing officer retains the duty to determine taxable turnover and may reject incomplete or unreliable books; however, if seized records fully cover clandestine transactions and correlate with the returns and books, further addition may be unwarranted. The burden is on the assessee to establish that correlation. On purchase tax, diamonds and precious stones used in studded ornaments may not attract levy under section 5A if they were separately billed and already taxed at the sale point, but that factual position required verification. The Tribunal and first appellate order were set aside and the matter remanded for fresh assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 953 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164549</link>
      <description>Compounding estimates made for fee purposes do not bind regular sales tax assessment, because the assessing officer retains the duty to determine taxable turnover and may reject incomplete or unreliable books; however, if seized records fully cover clandestine transactions and correlate with the returns and books, further addition may be unwarranted. The burden is on the assessee to establish that correlation. On purchase tax, diamonds and precious stones used in studded ornaments may not attract levy under section 5A if they were separately billed and already taxed at the sale point, but that factual position required verification. The Tribunal and first appellate order were set aside and the matter remanded for fresh assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>