<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 875 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164529</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s interference with a reassessment under section 12A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 was found unsustainable because it proceeded on an erroneous assumption that no material from the Income-tax Department existed. The assessment record and the material noticed by the assessing authority had not been properly appreciated, rendering the Tribunal&#039;s finding arbitrary and perverse. Where the lower authorities had not fully considered the record, the proper course was remand for fresh examination rather than outright allowance of the appeal. The matter was therefore remanded to the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes for reconsideration in accordance with law after giving reasonable opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 875 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164529</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s interference with a reassessment under section 12A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 was found unsustainable because it proceeded on an erroneous assumption that no material from the Income-tax Department existed. The assessment record and the material noticed by the assessing authority had not been properly appreciated, rendering the Tribunal&#039;s finding arbitrary and perverse. Where the lower authorities had not fully considered the record, the proper course was remand for fresh examination rather than outright allowance of the appeal. The matter was therefore remanded to the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes for reconsideration in accordance with law after giving reasonable opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>