<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1083 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164507</link>
    <description>Judicial discipline requires a revenue assessing authority to follow an existing appellate tribunal order on the same controversy, even where the State has filed pending revisions. Where the tribunal has decided the issue in favour of the assessees, the assessing authority should not continue with assessment or issue pre-assessment notices contrary to that decision unless the order is stayed or set aside. In the charter party context involving alleged transfer of the right to use goods, the proper course is to await the outcome of the pending revisions before taking further departmental action on the same issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1083 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164507</link>
      <description>Judicial discipline requires a revenue assessing authority to follow an existing appellate tribunal order on the same controversy, even where the State has filed pending revisions. Where the tribunal has decided the issue in favour of the assessees, the assessing authority should not continue with assessment or issue pre-assessment notices contrary to that decision unless the order is stayed or set aside. In the charter party context involving alleged transfer of the right to use goods, the proper course is to await the outcome of the pending revisions before taking further departmental action on the same issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>