<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 855 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164490</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the State&#039;s revision, modifying the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reinstate the gross profit rate set by the first appellate authority at 37%. The judgment emphasized the need for consistency and reasonableness in profit estimations, particularly in retail trade cases with pricing variations influenced by factors like hotel status and local competition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 10:37:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 855 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164490</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the State&#039;s revision, modifying the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reinstate the gross profit rate set by the first appellate authority at 37%. The judgment emphasized the need for consistency and reasonableness in profit estimations, particularly in retail trade cases with pricing variations influenced by factors like hotel status and local competition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>