https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246907 An adjudication order rejecting a rebate claim was set aside because it was passed on the incorrect assumption that no reply had been filed and no personal hearing was sought, despite the reply being on record and undisputed. The court held that failure to consider the reply and to grant a fair hearing violated natural justice, rendering the proceeding procedurally unfair. The merits of the rebate claim were not examined, and the matter was remitted to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision after hearing the petitioner. en-us Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Apr 2014 14:02:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246907 An adjudication order rejecting a rebate claim was set aside because it was passed on the incorrect assumption that no reply had been filed and no personal hearing was sought, despite the reply being on record and undisputed. The court held that failure to consider the reply and to grant a fair hearing violated natural justice, rendering the proceeding procedurally unfair. The merits of the rebate claim were not examined, and the matter was remitted to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision after hearing the petitioner. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246907