https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246899 The court found in favor of the petitioner in a winding-up petition against the respondent company for non-payment of supplied goods. The defense raised by the respondent regarding defective goods was deemed a sham defense as it lacked evidence and was introduced after the petition was filed. The court dismissed the respondent's claim of not receiving the statutory notice, noting evidence of dispatch and sufficient address details. The court appointed the Official Liquidator as a Provisional Liquidator, instructing the directors to provide company details within 21 days. Failure to comply would lead to liquidation proceedings. en-us Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Apr 2014 13:49:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246899 The court found in favor of the petitioner in a winding-up petition against the respondent company for non-payment of supplied goods. The defense raised by the respondent regarding defective goods was deemed a sham defense as it lacked evidence and was introduced after the petition was filed. The court dismissed the respondent's claim of not receiving the statutory notice, noting evidence of dispatch and sufficient address details. The court appointed the Official Liquidator as a Provisional Liquidator, instructing the directors to provide company details within 21 days. Failure to comply would lead to liquidation proceedings. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246899