<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 867 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246898</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the claim for relief under S.54F of the Act. It held that the property was originally acquired for residential purposes, entitling the assessee to the exemption. The Tribunal also directed the Assessing Officer to reexamine the treatment of the entire sale consideration as capital gains if the relief under S.54F was not granted. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remanded for further assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 867 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246898</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the claim for relief under S.54F of the Act. It held that the property was originally acquired for residential purposes, entitling the assessee to the exemption. The Tribunal also directed the Assessing Officer to reexamine the treatment of the entire sale consideration as capital gains if the relief under S.54F was not granted. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remanded for further assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>