<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 862 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246893</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Petitioner, holding that the reassessment proceedings were invalid as they were based on a &quot;change of opinion&quot; and lacked any allegation of failure to disclose material facts. The notice issued under section 148 was quashed, and the rule was made absolute in terms of the prayer clauses of the writ petition. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 13:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 862 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246893</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Petitioner, holding that the reassessment proceedings were invalid as they were based on a &quot;change of opinion&quot; and lacked any allegation of failure to disclose material facts. The notice issued under section 148 was quashed, and the rule was made absolute in terms of the prayer clauses of the writ petition. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>