<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 850 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164477</link>
    <description>Nylon tyre cord fabric was held not to qualify for sales tax exemption as &quot;man made fabrics&quot; under entry 11(ii) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act for 1995-96, because the commodity was specifically covered by tariff entry 59.02 and a specific tariff classification prevails over a general description. The later insertion of that commodity into the exemption entry from 1 April 1999 was treated as a substantive, prospective amendment, so the exemption claim failed. Interest levied under section 23(3) was set aside, however, because the tax had been paid under the Government&#039;s instalment facility and no default arose under that scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:25:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 850 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164477</link>
      <description>Nylon tyre cord fabric was held not to qualify for sales tax exemption as &quot;man made fabrics&quot; under entry 11(ii) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act for 1995-96, because the commodity was specifically covered by tariff entry 59.02 and a specific tariff classification prevails over a general description. The later insertion of that commodity into the exemption entry from 1 April 1999 was treated as a substantive, prospective amendment, so the exemption claim failed. Interest levied under section 23(3) was set aside, however, because the tax had been paid under the Government&#039;s instalment facility and no default arose under that scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>