<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1011 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164459</link>
    <description>A municipal corporation&#039;s written permission for hoardings on private premises was treated as a regulatory function under municipal law, not a taxable service in relation to sale of space for advertisement, because the corporation did not itself provide display space. The fee charged for such permission could not be subjected to service tax in the absence of a charging provision covering that activity. The corporation also lacked statutory authority to recover service tax on the licence or permission fee as a collecting agent. The impugned service-tax demands were therefore unsustainable and the amounts collected were directed to be refunded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1011 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164459</link>
      <description>A municipal corporation&#039;s written permission for hoardings on private premises was treated as a regulatory function under municipal law, not a taxable service in relation to sale of space for advertisement, because the corporation did not itself provide display space. The fee charged for such permission could not be subjected to service tax in the absence of a charging provision covering that activity. The corporation also lacked statutory authority to recover service tax on the licence or permission fee as a collecting agent. The impugned service-tax demands were therefore unsustainable and the amounts collected were directed to be refunded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>