<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 843 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164458</link>
    <description>Delay in filing applications for benefit under the compounding scheme in section 7D of the U.P. Trade Tax Act could not be condoned by invoking section 5 of the Limitation Act. The scheme prescribed a fixed filing period and only a limited further period on payment of late fee and interest; the applications were filed even beyond that extended period. As the governing statute did not incorporate the Limitation Act, the principle of condonation of delay was inapplicable. The challenge to rejection of the compounding applications therefore failed, and the issue was treated as covered by binding precedent of the same Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 16:33:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 843 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164458</link>
      <description>Delay in filing applications for benefit under the compounding scheme in section 7D of the U.P. Trade Tax Act could not be condoned by invoking section 5 of the Limitation Act. The scheme prescribed a fixed filing period and only a limited further period on payment of late fee and interest; the applications were filed even beyond that extended period. As the governing statute did not incorporate the Limitation Act, the principle of condonation of delay was inapplicable. The challenge to rejection of the compounding applications therefore failed, and the issue was treated as covered by binding precedent of the same Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>