<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 878 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164450</link>
    <description>A settlement certificate under the Dispute Settlement regime could be revoked only on a substantiated finding, recorded in writing, that the applicant obtained settlement by suppressing material facts or furnishing incorrect or false particulars. The tribunal found no independent material proving suppression or falsity, and held that a mere reference to a cross-revision did not by itself bar settlement. It also held that the show-cause notice was not without jurisdiction because the relevant rule had been amended to substitute the appropriate authority with the Senior Joint Commissioner. The notice was therefore quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:54:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 878 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164450</link>
      <description>A settlement certificate under the Dispute Settlement regime could be revoked only on a substantiated finding, recorded in writing, that the applicant obtained settlement by suppressing material facts or furnishing incorrect or false particulars. The tribunal found no independent material proving suppression or falsity, and held that a mere reference to a cross-revision did not by itself bar settlement. It also held that the show-cause notice was not without jurisdiction because the relevant rule had been amended to substitute the appropriate authority with the Senior Joint Commissioner. The notice was therefore quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>