<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 880 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164432</link>
    <description>A compounding application under the sales tax scheme may validly be acted on during the relevant year even if the order is passed after the first monthly return date, because no absolute time-limit is implied from the scheme. Filing regular monthly returns and paying tax in the interim does not by itself withdraw the pending application, which continues unless expressly withdrawn. Interest could not be levied for the period of official delay before service of the compounding demand, though interest remained possible for belated payment after the demand notice and for subsequent default; the penalty orders were directed to be recalled subject to compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2014 20:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 880 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164432</link>
      <description>A compounding application under the sales tax scheme may validly be acted on during the relevant year even if the order is passed after the first monthly return date, because no absolute time-limit is implied from the scheme. Filing regular monthly returns and paying tax in the interim does not by itself withdraw the pending application, which continues unless expressly withdrawn. Interest could not be levied for the period of official delay before service of the compounding demand, though interest remained possible for belated payment after the demand notice and for subsequent default; the penalty orders were directed to be recalled subject to compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>