<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1008 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164429</link>
    <description>Tomato sauce was held to fall within the broad inclusive entry for processed and preserved vegetables and fruits under Schedule II(B) of the Uttarakhand VAT Act, because it is a product derived from tomato and the entry contains no express exclusion for sauces. The Court applied ordinary commercial understanding and the rule that, where two views are possible in a taxing entry, the interpretation favourable to the assessee must be adopted. The result was that tomato sauce remained taxable at 4%, and the higher VAT levy at 12.5% was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1008 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164429</link>
      <description>Tomato sauce was held to fall within the broad inclusive entry for processed and preserved vegetables and fruits under Schedule II(B) of the Uttarakhand VAT Act, because it is a product derived from tomato and the entry contains no express exclusion for sauces. The Court applied ordinary commercial understanding and the rule that, where two views are possible in a taxing entry, the interpretation favourable to the assessee must be adopted. The result was that tomato sauce remained taxable at 4%, and the higher VAT levy at 12.5% was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>