<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1074 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164427</link>
    <description>The appellate authority&#039;s insistence on a twenty-five per cent pre-deposit before an appeal could be entertained reflects the mandatory language of the Assam Value Added Tax Act, which conditions appellate maintainability on compliance with the prescribed deposit. Revisional power under the Act remains subject to the statute&#039;s other provisions, and the proviso allowing relaxation in revision cannot be used to waive a separate appellate pre-deposit requirement. Where the challenge concerns only the deposit direction and not the assessment on merits, revisional interference is not warranted. The text emphasises that a statutory appeal operates only within the limits fixed by the legislation, and no implied relaxation mechanism can be read into the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1074 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164427</link>
      <description>The appellate authority&#039;s insistence on a twenty-five per cent pre-deposit before an appeal could be entertained reflects the mandatory language of the Assam Value Added Tax Act, which conditions appellate maintainability on compliance with the prescribed deposit. Revisional power under the Act remains subject to the statute&#039;s other provisions, and the proviso allowing relaxation in revision cannot be used to waive a separate appellate pre-deposit requirement. Where the challenge concerns only the deposit direction and not the assessment on merits, revisional interference is not warranted. The text emphasises that a statutory appeal operates only within the limits fixed by the legislation, and no implied relaxation mechanism can be read into the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>