<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1007 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164422</link>
    <description>Onida electronic washing machines were classified as electronic appliances under Entry C-II-97(b) rather than as domestic and commercial electrical appliances under Entry C-II-73(a), because the specific electronic entry governed over the broader electrical entry. The court relied on the earlier Supreme Court view that electronic washing machines are electronic goods and noted that Entry C-II-73(a) expressly referred to washing machines, while Entry C-II-97(b) covered electronic systems, instruments, apparatus and appliances not specified elsewhere. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s classification under Entry C-II-97(b) was sustained, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1007 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164422</link>
      <description>Onida electronic washing machines were classified as electronic appliances under Entry C-II-97(b) rather than as domestic and commercial electrical appliances under Entry C-II-73(a), because the specific electronic entry governed over the broader electrical entry. The court relied on the earlier Supreme Court view that electronic washing machines are electronic goods and noted that Entry C-II-73(a) expressly referred to washing machines, while Entry C-II-97(b) covered electronic systems, instruments, apparatus and appliances not specified elsewhere. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s classification under Entry C-II-97(b) was sustained, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>