<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 834 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246865</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI upheld the denial of CENVAT credit amounting to Rs.21,65,184/- to the appellant for the period from September 2007 to September 2010 due to the lack of establishing crucial factual aspects regarding the use of &#039;outdoor catering service&#039; in their factory canteen. Despite finding the adjudicating authority&#039;s distinction of the case law unconvincing, the Tribunal directed the appellant to predeposit Rs.5,00,000/- within six weeks and report compliance, with a waiver and stay on the remaining dues subject to due compliance. The judgment underscored the importance of a clear factual foundation to support claims based on legal precedents for entitlement to CENVAT credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2013 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 834 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246865</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI upheld the denial of CENVAT credit amounting to Rs.21,65,184/- to the appellant for the period from September 2007 to September 2010 due to the lack of establishing crucial factual aspects regarding the use of &#039;outdoor catering service&#039; in their factory canteen. Despite finding the adjudicating authority&#039;s distinction of the case law unconvincing, the Tribunal directed the appellant to predeposit Rs.5,00,000/- within six weeks and report compliance, with a waiver and stay on the remaining dues subject to due compliance. The judgment underscored the importance of a clear factual foundation to support claims based on legal precedents for entitlement to CENVAT credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>