<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 833 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246864</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the Customs Appeal, setting aside the penalty and interest imposed by the Adjudicating authority and the Appellate Authority. The Court held that payment of duty before the show cause notice does not absolve liability for penalty and interest, relying on Supreme Court precedents. The respondent&#039;s appeal was allowed, overturning the CESTAT&#039;s decision, emphasizing the consistent liability for duty, penalty, and interest regardless of the timing of duty payment relative to the notice issuance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2015 14:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 833 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246864</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the Customs Appeal, setting aside the penalty and interest imposed by the Adjudicating authority and the Appellate Authority. The Court held that payment of duty before the show cause notice does not absolve liability for penalty and interest, relying on Supreme Court precedents. The respondent&#039;s appeal was allowed, overturning the CESTAT&#039;s decision, emphasizing the consistent liability for duty, penalty, and interest regardless of the timing of duty payment relative to the notice issuance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>