<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 826 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246857</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, allowing the deduction for ex-gratia payments to employees not covered by the Payment of Bonus Act under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that such payments, made as an incentive for business expediency, were eligible for deduction as business expenditure. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, ruling in favor of the assessee without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 08:03:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 826 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246857</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, allowing the deduction for ex-gratia payments to employees not covered by the Payment of Bonus Act under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that such payments, made as an incentive for business expediency, were eligible for deduction as business expenditure. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, ruling in favor of the assessee without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>