<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 825 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246856</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in a Tax Case regarding the applicability of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2007-08. The Court upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling that the amount received by the individual was for construction work and not deemed dividend from a private limited company. The Court emphasized the lack of grounds to classify the transaction as deemed dividend, highlighting inconsistencies in the Revenue&#039;s arguments and supporting the individual&#039;s case based on factual findings and legal interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 825 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246856</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in a Tax Case regarding the applicability of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2007-08. The Court upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling that the amount received by the individual was for construction work and not deemed dividend from a private limited company. The Court emphasized the lack of grounds to classify the transaction as deemed dividend, highlighting inconsistencies in the Revenue&#039;s arguments and supporting the individual&#039;s case based on factual findings and legal interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>