<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 994 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164407</link>
    <description>The limitation period for rectification under section 37 of the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 binds the authority making the original rectification order, but it does not prevent an appellate or revisional authority from remanding an unlawful order for fresh consideration where the original order was passed within time. A remand after expiry of the rectification period is not treated as an impermissible extension of limitation when the earlier order is vitiated by breach of natural justice or defective procedure, including ineffective service of notice. The remand was therefore valid, the limitation point failed, and the rectification proceedings were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 994 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164407</link>
      <description>The limitation period for rectification under section 37 of the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 binds the authority making the original rectification order, but it does not prevent an appellate or revisional authority from remanding an unlawful order for fresh consideration where the original order was passed within time. A remand after expiry of the rectification period is not treated as an impermissible extension of limitation when the earlier order is vitiated by breach of natural justice or defective procedure, including ineffective service of notice. The remand was therefore valid, the limitation point failed, and the rectification proceedings were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>