<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 762 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164406</link>
    <description>Filtration of raw mustard oil into packed mustard oil did not amount to manufacture or production for sales tax exemption purposes under the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993. The court held that the broad definition of manufacture still required a noticeable and legally relevant change in the input product, and the process here merely removed impurities without creating a distinctly different commodity. The phrase &quot;producing such goods&quot; in section 9(4) was read as requiring actual production, which was not satisfied on these facts. The exemption claim therefore failed and the assessment and demand were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 762 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164406</link>
      <description>Filtration of raw mustard oil into packed mustard oil did not amount to manufacture or production for sales tax exemption purposes under the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993. The court held that the broad definition of manufacture still required a noticeable and legally relevant change in the input product, and the process here merely removed impurities without creating a distinctly different commodity. The phrase &quot;producing such goods&quot; in section 9(4) was read as requiring actual production, which was not satisfied on these facts. The exemption claim therefore failed and the assessment and demand were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>