<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 990 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164392</link>
    <description>An industrial deferral scheme for new and expansion units was held to govern the petitioner&#039;s claim for inclusion of Central sales tax liability in the eligibility certificate. Because the Government had treated expansion or diversification units on par with new units for eligibility, a separate exemption notification issued under a different provision could not restrict the deferral benefit. The exclusion of the Central sales tax component was therefore inconsistent with the governing policy, and the tax already recovered for the relevant periods had to be factored into rescheduling repayment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2014 15:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 990 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164392</link>
      <description>An industrial deferral scheme for new and expansion units was held to govern the petitioner&#039;s claim for inclusion of Central sales tax liability in the eligibility certificate. Because the Government had treated expansion or diversification units on par with new units for eligibility, a separate exemption notification issued under a different provision could not restrict the deferral benefit. The exclusion of the Central sales tax component was therefore inconsistent with the governing policy, and the tax already recovered for the relevant periods had to be factored into rescheduling repayment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>