<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 723 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164385</link>
    <description>Stay of tax recovery pending appeal may be granted only after examining the statutory preconditions, any required condonation of delay, the existence of a prima facie case, and the protection of revenue interest. The revisional court will not interfere unless the stay order discloses a jurisdictional error. On the facts described, the impugned order enhancing stay of recovery from 70% to 90% did not show such an error, and the revisionist had an effective remedy before the first appellate authority. Revisional interference was therefore declined, the stay order was left undisturbed, and the appeal was directed to be decided expeditiously in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 723 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164385</link>
      <description>Stay of tax recovery pending appeal may be granted only after examining the statutory preconditions, any required condonation of delay, the existence of a prima facie case, and the protection of revenue interest. The revisional court will not interfere unless the stay order discloses a jurisdictional error. On the facts described, the impugned order enhancing stay of recovery from 70% to 90% did not show such an error, and the revisionist had an effective remedy before the first appellate authority. Revisional interference was therefore declined, the stay order was left undisturbed, and the appeal was directed to be decided expeditiously in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>