<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1086 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164382</link>
    <description>Industrial promotion scheme exemption ceilings must be computed with reference to the actual sales tax incidence on the goods dealt in by the dealer, including any concessional rate already available under the taxing statute. Where the sales tax law contains no express prohibition on concurrent enjoyment of the concession and the industrial incentive, authorities cannot substitute higher rates applicable to other goods to reduce the exemption benefit. A harmonious reading of the scheme requires that similarly placed units not be treated differently merely because of the incentive option exercised. The exemption ceiling therefore had to be recalculated on the basis of the concessional rates applicable to the assessee&#039;s transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2014 18:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1086 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164382</link>
      <description>Industrial promotion scheme exemption ceilings must be computed with reference to the actual sales tax incidence on the goods dealt in by the dealer, including any concessional rate already available under the taxing statute. Where the sales tax law contains no express prohibition on concurrent enjoyment of the concession and the industrial incentive, authorities cannot substitute higher rates applicable to other goods to reduce the exemption benefit. A harmonious reading of the scheme requires that similarly placed units not be treated differently merely because of the incentive option exercised. The exemption ceiling therefore had to be recalculated on the basis of the concessional rates applicable to the assessee&#039;s transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>