<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 808 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246839</link>
    <description>The Court permitted reopening of the applicant&#039;s TIN number and granted interim protection against coercive recovery of tax for the relevant assessment year, but only on strict conditions. The applicant was required to deposit part of the amount within two weeks and furnish a bank guarantee for the balance. The Court clarified that no interim protection was extended for earlier assessment years, and failure to comply would allow recovery of the full tax by coercive measures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:16:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 808 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246839</link>
      <description>The Court permitted reopening of the applicant&#039;s TIN number and granted interim protection against coercive recovery of tax for the relevant assessment year, but only on strict conditions. The applicant was required to deposit part of the amount within two weeks and furnish a bank guarantee for the balance. The Court clarified that no interim protection was extended for earlier assessment years, and failure to comply would allow recovery of the full tax by coercive measures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>