<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 804 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246835</link>
    <description>Penalty under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act could not be sustained where it was levied and collected before issuance of a show cause notice and before giving an effective opportunity to explain the alleged contravention. Section 53(12) requires the officer to follow the statutory procedure, including notice and consideration of whether sufficient cause is shown, before imposing penalty. Recovery of the amount in advance rendered the levy unlawful, and the availability of an alternative appellate remedy did not cure the defect in procedure. The penalty order was quashed and the amount collected towards penalty was held refundable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 804 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246835</link>
      <description>Penalty under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act could not be sustained where it was levied and collected before issuance of a show cause notice and before giving an effective opportunity to explain the alleged contravention. Section 53(12) requires the officer to follow the statutory procedure, including notice and consideration of whether sufficient cause is shown, before imposing penalty. Recovery of the amount in advance rendered the levy unlawful, and the availability of an alternative appellate remedy did not cure the defect in procedure. The penalty order was quashed and the amount collected towards penalty was held refundable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>