https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246832 Review jurisdiction is confined to a manifest and obvious error apparent on the face of the record, and it cannot be used to reopen factual disputes or rely on new material not before the Court. A lease deed produced only with the review petition would require detailed factual examination, so it could not justify review. The Court also noted that the family settlement had been accepted for years, and the underlying judgment had proceeded on that arrangement's validity. For that reason, a separate discussion of the authorities cited on Section 108 of the Companies Act, 1956 was unnecessary. No ground for review was made out, and the review petition was dismissed. en-us Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:15:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246832 Review jurisdiction is confined to a manifest and obvious error apparent on the face of the record, and it cannot be used to reopen factual disputes or rely on new material not before the Court. A lease deed produced only with the review petition would require detailed factual examination, so it could not justify review. The Court also noted that the family settlement had been accepted for years, and the underlying judgment had proceeded on that arrangement's validity. For that reason, a separate discussion of the authorities cited on Section 108 of the Companies Act, 1956 was unnecessary. No ground for review was made out, and the review petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246832