<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 796 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246827</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s judgment addressed duty shortages, unregistered clearances, and penalties. It emphasized the need for concrete evidence to prove clandestine activities and adherence to excise procedures. The Tribunal set aside demands related to shortages but confirmed demands linked to unregistered clearances, imposing penalties. Penalties on appellants without specific allegations were set aside. The judgment highlighted the importance of substantiating charges with evidence and following proper procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:15:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 796 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246827</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s judgment addressed duty shortages, unregistered clearances, and penalties. It emphasized the need for concrete evidence to prove clandestine activities and adherence to excise procedures. The Tribunal set aside demands related to shortages but confirmed demands linked to unregistered clearances, imposing penalties. Penalties on appellants without specific allegations were set aside. The judgment highlighted the importance of substantiating charges with evidence and following proper procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>