<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 792 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246823</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant in a case involving service tax demands on construction services and manpower recruitment activities. The applicant was granted relief as the Tribunal found that the service tax demand related to construction services was not valid since the duty on the final product had been accepted by the Department, allowing the applicant to use their CENVAT credit account. Additionally, the demand for manpower recruitment services was deemed unjustified as the applicant only reimbursed salaries paid by their foreign counterpart, which did not fall under the taxable category. The Tribunal waived the predeposit requirement and granted a stay against recovery during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:14:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 792 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246823</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant in a case involving service tax demands on construction services and manpower recruitment activities. The applicant was granted relief as the Tribunal found that the service tax demand related to construction services was not valid since the duty on the final product had been accepted by the Department, allowing the applicant to use their CENVAT credit account. Additionally, the demand for manpower recruitment services was deemed unjustified as the applicant only reimbursed salaries paid by their foreign counterpart, which did not fall under the taxable category. The Tribunal waived the predeposit requirement and granted a stay against recovery during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>