<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 777 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246808</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal upheld the ld CIT(A)&#039;s order regarding the disallowance of interest expenses for investments in partnership firms under section 14A. The Tribunal affirmed the application of Rule 8D for computing the disallowance, considering the use of mixed funds for investments and the lack of connection between interest expenses and income earned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:13:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 777 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246808</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal upheld the ld CIT(A)&#039;s order regarding the disallowance of interest expenses for investments in partnership firms under section 14A. The Tribunal affirmed the application of Rule 8D for computing the disallowance, considering the use of mixed funds for investments and the lack of connection between interest expenses and income earned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>