<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 707 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164368</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras held that the petitioner&#039;s location in Chennai established jurisdiction for the court to hear the case. The court directed the first respondent to provide the petitioner with relevant documents within four weeks and allowed the petitioner to file objections within four weeks thereafter. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 707 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164368</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras held that the petitioner&#039;s location in Chennai established jurisdiction for the court to hear the case. The court directed the first respondent to provide the petitioner with relevant documents within four weeks and allowed the petitioner to file objections within four weeks thereafter. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>