<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 923 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164352</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the lack of discussion on the taxability of bone-meal in the original assessment order indicated non-application of mind rather than a change of opinion. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration on the turnover quantum. The Court emphasized that the validity of reassessment would not be open for adjudication. The revision was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 09:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 923 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164352</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the lack of discussion on the taxability of bone-meal in the original assessment order indicated non-application of mind rather than a change of opinion. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration on the turnover quantum. The Court emphasized that the validity of reassessment would not be open for adjudication. The revision was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>