https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164340 A revisional authority under the statute was held to have co-extensive power with the original licensing authority, so it was not confined to the limited grounds stated for grant, revocation or suspension and could take a different view on the same material. However, the cancellation order failed because it was made in breach of natural justice: the proceeding was quasi-judicial, the appellant had sought the underlying documents or an adequate summary, and the authority acted before giving a fair and effective opportunity to answer the material relied upon. The licence cancellation was therefore set aside. en-us Mon, 29 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Aug 2014 17:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164340 A revisional authority under the statute was held to have co-extensive power with the original licensing authority, so it was not confined to the limited grounds stated for grant, revocation or suspension and could take a different view on the same material. However, the cancellation order failed because it was made in breach of natural justice: the proceeding was quasi-judicial, the appellant had sought the underlying documents or an adequate summary, and the authority acted before giving a fair and effective opportunity to answer the material relied upon. The licence cancellation was therefore set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164340