https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164324 The SC held the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by altering paragraph 2 of Part I of the First Schedule and therefore its refixation of pension was illegal. The respondent, having not completed seven years' service, is entitled to pension under paragraph 9 of Part I: Rs. 8,400 p.a. for 4.10.1983-31.10.1986 and Rs. 15,750 p.a. from 1.11.1986. The Presidential addition of one month and 13 days affects only gratuity calculations. The appeal is allowed and the High Court's order is set aside. en-us Wed, 04 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Oct 2025 10:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164324 The SC held the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by altering paragraph 2 of Part I of the First Schedule and therefore its refixation of pension was illegal. The respondent, having not completed seven years' service, is entitled to pension under paragraph 9 of Part I: Rs. 8,400 p.a. for 4.10.1983-31.10.1986 and Rs. 15,750 p.a. from 1.11.1986. The Presidential addition of one month and 13 days affects only gratuity calculations. The appeal is allowed and the High Court's order is set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164324