https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246794 The Tribunal set aside the rejection of the remission application for duty on finished goods lost in a fire due to lack of specificity and absence of a speaking order. The matter was remanded for reconsideration following principles of natural justice. Additionally, the Tribunal remitted the duty liability on finished goods and reversal of cenvat credit issues back to the adjudicating authority for a joint reevaluation and issuance of a speaking order. Both appeals were allowed for further consideration by the adjudicating authority. en-us Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Apr 2014 06:42:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246794 The Tribunal set aside the rejection of the remission application for duty on finished goods lost in a fire due to lack of specificity and absence of a speaking order. The matter was remanded for reconsideration following principles of natural justice. Additionally, the Tribunal remitted the duty liability on finished goods and reversal of cenvat credit issues back to the adjudicating authority for a joint reevaluation and issuance of a speaking order. Both appeals were allowed for further consideration by the adjudicating authority. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246794