https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246791 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD upheld the Stay Order directing the appellant to deposit Rs.3.5 crores despite arguments on financial hardship and evidentiary disputes. The Bench extended the deposit deadline by eight weeks but warned of appeal dismissal for non-compliance. The decision hinged on balancing the appellant's financial position, evidentiary considerations, and the need for timely compliance with the deposit requirement. en-us Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Apr 2014 06:41:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246791 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD upheld the Stay Order directing the appellant to deposit Rs.3.5 crores despite arguments on financial hardship and evidentiary disputes. The Bench extended the deposit deadline by eight weeks but warned of appeal dismissal for non-compliance. The decision hinged on balancing the appellant's financial position, evidentiary considerations, and the need for timely compliance with the deposit requirement. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246791