https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246789 Where an effective statutory appellate remedy is available against an assessment order, writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be invoked before that remedy is exhausted. The Supreme Court held that the proper course for one set of petitions was to approach the First Appellate Authority, while the other set had to proceed before the Tribunal in view of their procedural history. The High Court's refusal to insist on the appellate route was set aside, and the petitioners were relegated to the appropriate statutory appellate forum with liberty to file proceedings within the time granted. en-us Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Apr 2014 06:41:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246789 Where an effective statutory appellate remedy is available against an assessment order, writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be invoked before that remedy is exhausted. The Supreme Court held that the proper course for one set of petitions was to approach the First Appellate Authority, while the other set had to proceed before the Tribunal in view of their procedural history. The High Court's refusal to insist on the appellate route was set aside, and the petitioners were relegated to the appropriate statutory appellate forum with liberty to file proceedings within the time granted. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246789