https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5582 The article addresses whether service on an employee satisfies the registered post with acknowledgement requirement for central excise proceedings and thus fixes the commencement of the appeal limitation period. In Raj Ratan Industry Ltd., documentary acknowledgements and company correspondence established that the employee was an authorized signatory; the High Court applied the statutory definition of authorized representative to hold that service on the employee complied with the service rules and therefore the appeal was time barred. en-us Tue, 22 Apr 2014 06:38:29 +0530 Tue, 22 Apr 2014 06:38:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5582 The article addresses whether service on an employee satisfies the registered post with acknowledgement requirement for central excise proceedings and thus fixes the commencement of the appeal limitation period. In Raj Ratan Industry Ltd., documentary acknowledgements and company correspondence established that the employee was an authorized signatory; the High Court applied the statutory definition of authorized representative to hold that service on the employee complied with the service rules and therefore the appeal was time barred. Articles Central Excise Tue, 22 Apr 2014 06:38:29 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5582