<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 749 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246780</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision that the assessee was not entitled to exemption under Section 11 due to violations of Section 11 (4) and 11 (4A). The Court directed a reevaluation by the Assessing Officer to consider deductions for legitimate expenditure and depreciation in accordance with the law, emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of these allowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 19:17:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 749 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246780</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision that the assessee was not entitled to exemption under Section 11 due to violations of Section 11 (4) and 11 (4A). The Court directed a reevaluation by the Assessing Officer to consider deductions for legitimate expenditure and depreciation in accordance with the law, emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of these allowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>