<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 745 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246776</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned after the assessee supported the explanation with an affidavit and the delay was found neither deliberate nor mala fide. The text applies a liberal approach to limitation where the explanation discloses bona fide reasons, emphasizing that substantial justice should prevail over technical considerations. Refusing condonation would risk excluding a potentially meritorious matter at the threshold. The matter was therefore restored to the first appellate authority for decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 19:17:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 745 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246776</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned after the assessee supported the explanation with an affidavit and the delay was found neither deliberate nor mala fide. The text applies a liberal approach to limitation where the explanation discloses bona fide reasons, emphasizing that substantial justice should prevail over technical considerations. Refusing condonation would risk excluding a potentially meritorious matter at the threshold. The matter was therefore restored to the first appellate authority for decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>