<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 736 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246767</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and partly allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeals. It confirmed that the additions made by the Assessing Officer were not justified as they were based on presumptions without corroborative evidence. The CIT(A)&#039;s detailed examination and factual findings were upheld, leading to the deletion of various additions related to unexplained investments, income from the sale of plots, unaccounted receipts, and other discrepancies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 21:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 736 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246767</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and partly allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeals. It confirmed that the additions made by the Assessing Officer were not justified as they were based on presumptions without corroborative evidence. The CIT(A)&#039;s detailed examination and factual findings were upheld, leading to the deletion of various additions related to unexplained investments, income from the sale of plots, unaccounted receipts, and other discrepancies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>