<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 828 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164241</link>
    <description>Input tax credit under the West Bengal Value Added Tax Act, 2003 is confined to registered dealers, because section 22 links the benefit to registration, tax invoices from registered dealers, and prescribed record-keeping, while the registration and return provisions support that scheme. The restriction on credit for purchases made during the unregistered period was upheld as a reasonable classification with a rational nexus to verification, monitoring, widening the tax base, and compliance. Although the Act aims to remove cascading tax, the legislative choice to limit credit to registered dealers was found neither arbitrary nor discriminatory, and the disallowance of credit for the pre-registration period was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 10:57:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 828 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164241</link>
      <description>Input tax credit under the West Bengal Value Added Tax Act, 2003 is confined to registered dealers, because section 22 links the benefit to registration, tax invoices from registered dealers, and prescribed record-keeping, while the registration and return provisions support that scheme. The restriction on credit for purchases made during the unregistered period was upheld as a reasonable classification with a rational nexus to verification, monitoring, widening the tax base, and compliance. Although the Act aims to remove cascading tax, the legislative choice to limit credit to registered dealers was found neither arbitrary nor discriminatory, and the disallowance of credit for the pre-registration period was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>