https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164238 The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the validity of Notification No. 698/XXVII (8) Commercial Tax (VAT)/2007. It found that the notification aligns with the amended law post the amendment to Section 8 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments regarding promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation, stating that the withdrawal of the tax concession was a result of statutory changes. The provisional assessment orders and penalty order were upheld, and the interim order from June 23, 2008, was automatically vacated. en-us Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164238 The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the validity of Notification No. 698/XXVII (8) Commercial Tax (VAT)/2007. It found that the notification aligns with the amended law post the amendment to Section 8 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments regarding promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation, stating that the withdrawal of the tax concession was a result of statutory changes. The provisional assessment orders and penalty order were upheld, and the interim order from June 23, 2008, was automatically vacated. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164238