https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246763 In a pending tax assessment under the Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act, a separate fresh notice was not required where the assessee had already received repeated hearing opportunities, notices, appearances and adjournments; the statutory requirement was a reasonable opportunity of hearing, not an additional notice in those facts, so the assessment was not vitiated by natural justice concerns. The Court also reiterated that where the Act provides an efficacious appellate, revisional and review framework, writ jurisdiction should not ordinarily be used to bypass that remedy absent exceptional circumstances, so the writ petitions were not maintainable. en-us Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246763 In a pending tax assessment under the Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act, a separate fresh notice was not required where the assessee had already received repeated hearing opportunities, notices, appearances and adjournments; the statutory requirement was a reasonable opportunity of hearing, not an additional notice in those facts, so the assessment was not vitiated by natural justice concerns. The Court also reiterated that where the Act provides an efficacious appellate, revisional and review framework, writ jurisdiction should not ordinarily be used to bypass that remedy absent exceptional circumstances, so the writ petitions were not maintainable. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246763