https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246751 The Tribunal held that SGSPL's valuation for excise duty was correct, rejecting the job worker classification under Rule 10A. The extended limitation period was deemed inapplicable due to regular compliance. Penalties and interest imposed were set aside as the demand was overturned. The appeals were allowed, granting relief to SGSPL. en-us Tue, 25 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Sep 2014 14:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246751 The Tribunal held that SGSPL's valuation for excise duty was correct, rejecting the job worker classification under Rule 10A. The extended limitation period was deemed inapplicable due to regular compliance. Penalties and interest imposed were set aside as the demand was overturned. The appeals were allowed, granting relief to SGSPL. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246751