<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 711 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246742</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s challenge on various issues including unaccounted sales, under-valuation of closing stock, job charges, salary expenses, and unsecured loans under section 68. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee on each issue, citing lack of justification by the Assessing Officer and supporting evidence provided by the assessee. As no substantial legal question was raised to dispute the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:53:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 711 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246742</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s challenge on various issues including unaccounted sales, under-valuation of closing stock, job charges, salary expenses, and unsecured loans under section 68. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee on each issue, citing lack of justification by the Assessing Officer and supporting evidence provided by the assessee. As no substantial legal question was raised to dispute the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>