<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 702 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246733</link>
    <description>A permanent establishment under Article 5 of the India-Mauritius DTAA depends on a fixed place of business at the foreign enterprise&#039;s disposal and a factual, functional link to business carried on through that place; on the stated facts, continuous India-based activity through consultants, meetings, training, reviews and project implementation supported PE existence. Profit attribution was treated as a separate economic-nexus inquiry requiring fresh determination where not previously examined. On expenditure, treaty-based allowance of salary-related and head-office was accepted in principle, while verification-based disallowance of direct expenditure for A.Y. 1997-98 was sustained for lack of vouchers. Indirect expenditure allocation was accepted in principle on a reasonable basis under Article 7(3), subject to verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:53:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 702 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246733</link>
      <description>A permanent establishment under Article 5 of the India-Mauritius DTAA depends on a fixed place of business at the foreign enterprise&#039;s disposal and a factual, functional link to business carried on through that place; on the stated facts, continuous India-based activity through consultants, meetings, training, reviews and project implementation supported PE existence. Profit attribution was treated as a separate economic-nexus inquiry requiring fresh determination where not previously examined. On expenditure, treaty-based allowance of salary-related and head-office was accepted in principle, while verification-based disallowance of direct expenditure for A.Y. 1997-98 was sustained for lack of vouchers. Indirect expenditure allocation was accepted in principle on a reasonable basis under Article 7(3), subject to verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>