<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 698 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246729</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, recognizing the commission payment to ACL as a genuine business expenditure for commercial expediency and necessity. Emphasizing the genuine nature of transactions and past acceptance by the Department, the Tribunal upheld the claim under section 37(1), setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order disallowing the commission on sales.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:52:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 698 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246729</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, recognizing the commission payment to ACL as a genuine business expenditure for commercial expediency and necessity. Emphasizing the genuine nature of transactions and past acceptance by the Department, the Tribunal upheld the claim under section 37(1), setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order disallowing the commission on sales.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>