<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 942 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246720</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating they were not liable to pay CE duty on copper wire used in manufacturing insulated cables. The demands and penalties were set aside, and both appeals were allowed. The judgment clarified the appellant&#039;s entitlement to duty exemption based on the relevant legal provisions, emphasizing the exemption under Notification No.6/2006 CE and the exception in the proviso to Notification No.67/95 CE.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 942 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246720</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating they were not liable to pay CE duty on copper wire used in manufacturing insulated cables. The demands and penalties were set aside, and both appeals were allowed. The judgment clarified the appellant&#039;s entitlement to duty exemption based on the relevant legal provisions, emphasizing the exemption under Notification No.6/2006 CE and the exception in the proviso to Notification No.67/95 CE.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>